dcrest.blogg.se

Xmlmind docx to html converter command
Xmlmind docx to html converter command






xmlmind docx to html converter command

In the meantime, keep watching this space for more DITA news and analysis. Let’s meet back in a year and see how many of these predictions pan out.

  • Continued growth of DITA outside of its software/IT core.
  • DITA becoming the de facto choice for documentation within software/IT firms.
  • The DITA tool market will likely begin to see signs of consolidation with select players taking the lead, though there is still room for firms who can bring strong and compelling products to DITA authors.
  • More firms will enter the mature phase of DITA adoption.
  • DITA adoption will continue to grow slowly but steadily.
  • Where will DITA adoption be a year from now? While I hesitate to pull out my crystal ball (after all, those things are fragile) I think I can safely make the following predictions based on the trends observed: DITA still dominates in the software/IT sectors, but it is increasingly seeing usage outside of those two “core” sectors, and the relative sizes of firms looking for those with DITA experience follows a continuing trend. The industry as a whole appears to have entered a more mature phase, though there are still a sizable number of firms seeking to migrate to DITA, so there are still jobs out there for people looking to help with the transition, but that type of opportunity is getting smaller over time.

    xmlmind docx to html converter command

    While there are other technical writing standards out there, it is by far the most popular, and may have help kill off DocBook. So Where is DITA Now and Where is it Going?ĭITA continues to be a sought-after skill among technical writers, with increasing demand. If anyone has any other thoughts on this why this reoccurring pattern exists, please leave your comments below! I am guessing that firms at these sizes are themselves going through a maturation process where old-school/brute-force methods of doing documentation still hold sway. I suspect that very small firms (1-10 employees) adopt DITA because of the relatively low-cost of the tools involved, but I have a harder time explaining the relatively low adoption pattern that exists with medium-to-large (201-1000 employee) and medium-large (5,001-10,000) firms. In these cases it just “makes sense” to do things using DITA. Large and very-large firms reap the same benefits in addition to others (reduced localization costs, content reuse across a wider range of products, exchanging DITA-based content with partners) that come with scale.Small firms benefit from the more efficient processes (content reuse, de-siloed writers) that DITA has to offer, and those benefits are more pronounced with small to mid-sized firms.I would be interested in hearing from others as to why they think this pattern exists, and here are my thoughts: 2013)Īs you can see there is a continuum of DITA usage, with firms of all sizes seeking people with DITA experience, but with three peaks, which occur with the very large (10,000+ employees), large (1,001-5,000 employees) and medium-sized (51-200 employees) firms.

    xmlmind docx to html converter command

    Size of Companies with DITA Job Postings (Sept.








    Xmlmind docx to html converter command